|
Hooplar
May 13, 2014 15:51:02 GMT -5
Post by EmoHokage on May 13, 2014 15:51:02 GMT -5
And I could have friends who would fight for me and have cool powers and change form when they get strong enough.
|
|
|
Hooplar
May 13, 2014 18:01:48 GMT -5
Post by John Hardy on May 13, 2014 18:01:48 GMT -5
I'd teach them to give BJs
|
|
|
Hooplar
May 15, 2014 0:05:17 GMT -5
Post by EmoHokage on May 15, 2014 0:05:17 GMT -5
Thats bestiality, fairly certain thats illegal.
|
|
|
Hooplar
May 15, 2014 13:05:55 GMT -5
Post by John Hardy on May 15, 2014 13:05:55 GMT -5
they are monsters, not animals. it doesn't count.
|
|
|
Hooplar
May 15, 2014 16:11:39 GMT -5
Post by EmoHokage on May 15, 2014 16:11:39 GMT -5
Nah, they are animals.
|
|
|
Hooplar
May 16, 2014 11:27:20 GMT -5
Post by John Hardy on May 16, 2014 11:27:20 GMT -5
pokemon means pocket monsters. that's what they are, monsters... like on sesame street.
|
|
|
Hooplar
May 16, 2014 23:13:20 GMT -5
Post by EmoHokage on May 16, 2014 23:13:20 GMT -5
No they are animals, I don't accept them being monsters. Monster implies bad thing, pokemon aren't bad... mostly.
|
|
|
Hooplar
May 17, 2014 12:02:59 GMT -5
Post by John Hardy on May 17, 2014 12:02:59 GMT -5
Sesame Street characters are also monsters... and Monsters Inc. and Digimon... monsters aren't always bad... they choose their fate like everyone else. either way, it doesn't change the fact that pokemon are pocket monsters.
|
|
|
Hooplar
May 19, 2014 12:32:42 GMT -5
Post by EmoHokage on May 19, 2014 12:32:42 GMT -5
Monster implies bad things, they arent monsters. Pokemon are animals. Monsters Inc are something else, except for the bad ones, they are monsters. BECAUSE MONSTER IMPLIES BAD. Same with digimon.
|
|
|
Hooplar
May 19, 2014 15:41:46 GMT -5
Post by John Hardy on May 19, 2014 15:41:46 GMT -5
too bad it's still a fact that they are called pocket monsters in Japan. the only reason the US shorted it to pokemon was because of a copyright issue with pocket monsters being owned by a some no one cares about company... it's still short for pocket monsters. Monster rancher monsters are also not evil, digimon only a small percentage of monsters are evil, seseme street 0% of the monsters are evil, 0% of the muppets monsters are evil, where the wild things are the monsters aren't evil. monster doesn't imply evil or bad, it just implies a different type of being. in some cases monster can be considered a good thing... like "man that sandwich was a monster" or "you're a monster at that game" you're drawing conclusions from a single definition. Japan sees monsters as friends, most of their games and anime shows prove that. The US does that too, a lot of their shows and games try to show that too.
|
|
|
Hooplar
May 21, 2014 10:01:44 GMT -5
Post by EmoHokage on May 21, 2014 10:01:44 GMT -5
No they are animals, I don't accept them being monsters. Monster implies bad thing, pokemon aren't bad... mostly.
|
|
|
Hooplar
May 21, 2014 13:22:36 GMT -5
Post by John Hardy on May 21, 2014 13:22:36 GMT -5
monster trucks aren't bad...
|
|
|
Hooplar
May 23, 2014 0:14:25 GMT -5
Post by EmoHokage on May 23, 2014 0:14:25 GMT -5
neither are you
|
|
|
Hooplar
May 23, 2014 11:59:47 GMT -5
Post by John Hardy on May 23, 2014 11:59:47 GMT -5
you realize if they were animals and being forced to fight each other it would be no different than dog fighting or cock fighting. at least monsters fighting one another wouldn't be ethically evil.
|
|
|
Hooplar
May 24, 2014 23:06:19 GMT -5
Post by EmoHokage on May 24, 2014 23:06:19 GMT -5
Nah I dont care because the pokemon have feelings and dont fight if they dont have to. AKA Charizard.
|
|